You are here

Proposals to increase nursing home charges are unfair and unjust

Published 03/04/2015

SHARE THIS

Age Action would vehemently oppose any move to pass additional nursing home costs on to vulnerable older people or to put a charge on them after their death for any community-based services they need.

The proposals are part of an unpublished review of the Nursing Home Support Scheme for nursing home beds, prepared for the Department of Health and the HSE, the details of which were broadcast by RTE’s Prime Time programme last night.  The report found that options included an increased state investment in the scheme or an increased contribution by those in nursing homes. 

The options for increasing the contribution of nursing home residents included reducing the income disregard threshold for the means testing of a person’s income, increasing the annual charge on a person’s assets from 7.5% to 10%, increasing the number of years on which a person would pay a percentage of the value of their home (currently 7.5% per annum for three years), and increasing the percentage of person’s disposable income which would be contributed for those with incomes above the State Pension (currently a person pays 80% of their disposable income). 

The report also recommends that consideration be given to charging people for their community-based care, with the charge being imposed on their estate after their death.

Age Action warned today that the way in which the Nursing Home Support Scheme (NHSS) charges  the sickest of older people for essential care is fundamentally unfair, in that no other section of society is required to pay from their disposable income, additional assets and a portion of the value of their home towards their care.

“The proposals to increase the level of these charges would add insult to injury and would be opposed by older people and their families,” Age Action Head of Advocacy and Communications, Eamon Timmins said.

The existing charging structure is already causing hardship for older people.  For example, an older person whose only income is the state pension is left with €46 per week after the Fair Deal charges.  The so-called “Fair Deal” only covers basic bed and board, and does not cover other costs such as therapies (eg physiotherapy or chiropody), specialised wheelchairs or equipment, hair cuts, soap, shampoo etc.

“While the entitlement to a public bed exists in other parts of the health system, the introduction of the NHSS in 2009 extinguished the public bed in a nursing home, so that older people who need round-the-clock nursing care are left with the choice of signing up for the Fair Deal or paying the full fee privately,” Mr Timmins explained.

Although the scheme is only in place six years, charges have already been increased once.  “The range of increased charges proposed by the Department of Health’s document suggests a lack of understanding of the inequity of the scheme and that a belief that this inequity can be increased further – that older people who are sick and frail are a resource that can be tapped time and again,” Mr Timmins said.

SHARE THIS

Older people’s organisations say Government response to financial pressure of COVID-19 is piecemeal and inadequate

 (Tuesday, 31 March 2020) Age Action and Active Retirement Ireland have described the Government extension of the fuel allowance as ‘piecemeal and inadequate’.

 Age Action & Active Retirement Ireland today criticized the piecemeal nature of the Government’s response to the financial challenges facing older people affected by the COVID-19 crisis. They argue that close to 70% of pensioners will not benefit from the announcement.